50. Jahrgang Nr. 8 / Serptember 2020
Datenschutzerklärung | Zum Archiv | Suche




Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Dezember 2004
Neues aus der Konzilskirche


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2004
Franz Nomista: Stellungnahme zur Frage: Welches ist die zentrale Häresie der sog. 'Konzils-Kirche?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juli 2004
Craig Heimbichner: Die talmudistische Note - Die wahre Geschichte der Ersetzung des Offertoriums


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juli 2004
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2005
Zum Tode von Johannes Paul II.


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2005
Die Krise der Kirche ist hausgemacht


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2005
Habemus Papam?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2005
Anhang: Ratzingers Stellungnahme zu verschiedenen Themen


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2005
Die Krise des Glaubens und der Verfall der röm.-kath. Kirche


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2005
Eine kritische Analyse von Ratzingers Dominus Jesus


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2005
Gloria olivae - Joseph Ratzinger - Benedikt XVI.


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2005
'Exkommunikation' von S.E. Erzbischof Ngô-dinh-Thuc durch 'Kardinal' Ratzinger


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2005
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NAHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2005
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat November 2004
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2004
L’ERREUR FONDAMENTALE DE VATICAN II


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2004
Remarques connexe


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Oktober 2004
Cual es la herejsia central de asi llamada


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2004
EL ERROR PRINCIPAL DEL VATICANO II


Ausgabe Nr. 10 Monat Dezember 2004
Remarques connexe


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat August 2005
Rundschreiben Mediator Dei et hominum, Vorwort/Gliederung


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2005
Zur aktuellen Situation


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2005
NACHRICHTEN ZUM AKTUELLEN GESCHEHEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2005
Zur theologischen Position von Kardinal Ratzinger


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2005
Das Konzil und der viel zitierte Heilige Geist - mit Blick auf Parallelen im Mittelalter


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2005
Das II. Vatikanische Konzil und die theologische Sprachverwirrung


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2005
Ein terminologisches Dilemma


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2005
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Dezember 2005
Zur Theologie und Philosophie Joseph Ratzingers


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Dezember 2005
Clemens August Kardinal Graf von Galen


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Dezember 2005
Unfreundliche Betrachtungen


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
HABEMUS PAPAM?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
Sobre la situacin actual de la Iglesia


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
A propos de la situation actuelle de lEglise


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat december 2005
A commentary on the present situation of the Church


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2006
Am Scheideweg


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2006
Brief an die Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2003
Hresie der Formlosigkeit. Die rmische Liturgie und ihr Feind


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2003
ber das Papsttum der Rmischen Bischfe


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2003
ber das Papsttum der Rmischen Bischfe


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juli 2003
Zur derzeitigen Situation der Kirche


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat September 2003
Der Hauptirrtum des II. Vatikanums: extra Ecclesiam salus est


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
Sobre la situacin actual de la Iglesia (esp.)


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
A propos de la situation actuelle de lEglise (fr.)


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat October 2003
A commentary on the present situation of the Church (engl.)


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mrz 2002
Zitate


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mrz 2002
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat September 2002
Die gttliche Wahrheit erkennen


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat November 2002
ber das Papsttum der Rmischen Bischfe


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
Dominus Jesus


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Diciembre 2001
ESSERE CRISTIANI SENZA CHIESA ?


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 2001
Unerwartete


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 2001
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 2001
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat September 2001
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Dezember 2001
DIE SCHPFUNG - EIN GTTLICHER PLAN - Buchbesprechung


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2000
SER CRISTIANO SIN IGLESIA? - UNA PONENCIA-


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
Bewegung fr die gegrndet


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
Zur Verffentlichung des 3. Geheimnisses von Fatima


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Nov.-Doppel-Nr.4/5 2000
ESSERE CRISTIANI SENZA CHIESA ?


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Mrz 2001
Dominus Iesus


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Mrz 2001
Lettera a cristiani preoccupati (ital)


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1999
OFFENER BRIEF AN DIE PFARREI HARTKIRCHEN


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1999
CHRIST SEIN OHNE KIRCHE?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1999
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1999
Brief an besorgte Christen


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1999
Warum die Einsicht Ecne untersttzt


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1999
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 2000
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1998
KUMENE - QUO VADIS?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1998
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1999
Brief an besorgte Christen


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2006
In der Diaspora


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2006
Die Rechtfertigung - Stellungnahme


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2006
Der Protestantismus und seine kumenische Aufwertung


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat April 2006
Leserbriefe zu dem Artikel


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1997
KUMENE ?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1997
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1998
Gott, von dem ich nicht einmal wei, ob er berhaupt existiert


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1998
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1993
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1994
WAS BEDEUTET DIE UNZERSTRBARKEIT DER KATHOLISCHEN KIRCHE?


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1996
EIN SOLCHER RELIGIONSUNTERRICHT VERDIENT NICHT SEINEN NAMEN


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1996
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1996
CLOQUELL ZUM BISCHOF KONSEKRIERT ?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1996
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1997
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1995
Nachruf auf Herrn Dr. Carlos Disandro


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1995
NUR NOCH AUSLAUFMODELL?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1994
DER WEIHERITUS PAULS VI. IST UNGLTIG...


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1994
Gegen den atheistischen bermenschen


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1994
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Mrz 1995
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1992
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 1992
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1992
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Mai 2006
Brief an die treuen Bewahrer des kath. Glaubens


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Mai 2006
Ratzinger/Benedikt XVI. im Visier


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Mai 2006
Leserbriefe zu dem Beitrag Am Scheideweg


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Mai 2006
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1991
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1991
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1992
ANKUPPLUNG POSTHUM?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1990
DAS RTSEL UM MGR. M. LEFEBVRE


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1989
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1990
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Januar 1989
DIE KRISE DES GLAUBENS UND DER VERFALL DER RM.-KATH. KIRCHE


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2005
DIE KRISE DES GLAUBENS (Fortsetzung


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Januar 1989
DIE KRISE DES GLAUBENS (Fortsetzung


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1988
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1988
S C H I S M A ?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1988
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1988
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 8 Monat Mrz 1989
ERKLRUNG NICHT WIDERRUFEN


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai/Juni 1987
DAS DRITTE GEHEIMNIS VON FATIMA


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai/Juni 1987
TRADITION - WIRKLICHKEIT, PHANTASIE ODER BETRUG?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1987
NACHRICHT, NACHRICHT, NACHRICHT...


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1987
ECONE UND ROM


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1987
BERLEGUNGEN ZUM VATIKAN-DOKUMENT BER BIO-ETHIK


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Mrz 1988
NEW AGE


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1986
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1986
EINE DOGMATISCHE ANALYSE ... u.a. AUFSTZE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1986
THEOLOGISCHES AUS ECONE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1986
INKONSEQUENZEN, INKONSEQUENZEN... BRIEEFWECHSEL


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1986
LEX CREDENDI, LEX ORANDI... - ODER NICHT ?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Januar 1987
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1985
DER LETZTE BETRUG ROMS


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat April 1985
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 1985
EINE REFORM DER KONZILIAREN REFORMEN


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Juli 1985
OFFENER BRIEF


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1985
BRIEF VON HERRN PROF. DR. D. WENDLAND AN DIE REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar/Mrz 1986
EINE REFORM DER REFORMEN ?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juli 2006
Unsere 'zahlreichen Mitstreiter' oder: der tiefe Graben


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juli 2006
Fastenpredigt 2006


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1984
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 2013
Die Irrtmer des II. Vatikanums und ihre berwindung


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 1984
NACHLESE ZUM SOG. NEUEN 'KIRCHENRECHT'


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1984
LESERBRIEF: ZUR UNRECHTMSSIGKEIT DER WAHL VON MGR. K. WOJTYLA


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1984
ZUR SOG. 'WIEDERZULASSUNG' DER (TRIDENTINISCHEN) MESSE


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1985
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2006
5. Brief an die treuen Bewahrer des katholischen Glaubens


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2006
Diaspora


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Oktober 2006
Wenn die Kirche nicht gttlich wre...


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1983
DIE ANGRIFFE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1983
Die Wojtylanische Diktatur


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1983
Bekanntmachung der Kongregation fr die Glaubenslehre


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1983
ERZBISCHOF NGO DINH THUC 'EXKOMMUNIZIERT'


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 1983
Die Wojtylanische Diktatur


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1983
MODERNE 'KIRCHEN'GESCHICHTE - EIN RCKBLICK


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1983
Die Wojtylanische Diktatur


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1983
HELDEN MIT AUSZEICHNUNG UNERWNSCHT


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1984
MARGINALIEN ZUM LUTHER-JAHR


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat August 1982
NACHRICHTEN... NACHRICHTEN... NACHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 1982
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN...


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Februar 1983
WIE ECONE DIE KIRCHE ERNEUERT - EIN OFFENBARUNGSEID


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Mrz 1983
ERSTES SELBSTNDIGES DENKEN ODER HEUCHELEI ?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1981
SIND DIE NEUEN WEIHERITEN NACH VATIKANUM II GLTIG?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1981
BER H.H. RATZINGER, DER BEANSPRUCHT, BISCHOF VON MNCHEN ZU SEIN


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1981
MODERNISMUS UND REFORMKATHOLIZISMUS


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1982
LEFEBVRE AM ZIEL SEINER WNSCHE ?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1982
KLERIKALES SCHEINGEFECHT


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1982
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1980
EINSICHT!


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1980
ANTWORT VON H.H. PFARRER HANS MILCH


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Oktober 1980
REPONSE DE HR L'ABBE HANS MILCH AUX QUESTIONS


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1980
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1980
OFFENER BRIEF EINES GLUBIGEN PROTESTANTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1981
DIE NEUE PRIESTERWEIHE IST KEIN KATHOLISCHER RITUS MEHR


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Dezember 2006
Und ihr werdet sein wie Gott


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 1979
MIT DER ZEIT BERNEHMEN WIR, ECONE, ALLE MESSZENTREN!


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Juni 1978
WIE LANGE WILL DR. KLAUS GAMBER UNS NOCH TUSCHEN?


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Juni 1978
VOX FIDE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1978
DESWEGEN SIND WIR PROTESTANTEN GEWORDEN


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1978
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION/LESERBRIEFE


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Oktober 1978
DE MORTUIS NISI BENE ? ZU MONTINIS TOD


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1978
HTET EUCH VOR DEN FALSCHEN PROPHETEN !


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat November 1978
DIE KIRCHE ALS DIE WAHRE INSTITUTION DES HEILS


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1978
JOHANNES PAUL II.


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1978
SIE LGEN, PATER WERENFRIED


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1979
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1979
DIE FOLGENSCHWERE KRISE DER KIRCHE


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1979
SEKTE MIT IMPRIMATUR


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mai 1977
DER 'VON NIEMANDEM DIRIGIERTE' KONZILSBERATER JOSEF RATZINGER


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juli 1977
DIE SITUATION DER KIRCHE IN EINER UNBEKANNTEN VISION DER ANNA KATHARINA EMMERICK


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1977
MITTEILUNGEN DER REDAKTION


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Dezember 1977
SACRIFICIUM INTELLECTUS


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1978
KIRCHENZERSTRER - EINST UND HEUTE


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Februar 1978
GEGENWART DER KIRCHE IN DER WELT


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1978
NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN, NACHRICHTEN


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1978
NIE ETWAS NEUES: DER 'BERHOLTE MODERNISMUS'


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2007
bermchtiges Schweigen


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2007
Hohlheit bis zum Unsinn ?


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2007
Betrachtungen ber die erste Enzyklika Benedikts XVI.


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
EN LA ENCRUCIJADA


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
la croise des chemins


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
At the crossroads


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
Y seris como Dios (Gn. 3, 5)


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2007
And thou wilt be like God (Gen. 3,5)


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat April 1977
FAULE FRCHTE


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2007
Die Prophezeihungen des Herrn von Cazotte


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2007
Mitteilungen der Reaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 56 Monat August/Sept. 1974
TU ES PETRUS


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat Dezember 1974
CORNELIUS UND CYPRIAN


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 1975
DIE EHEZWECKE


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mai 2007
Ratzinger und die heidnischen Sexual-Gtter


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mai 2007
Ratzinger und die heidnischen Sexual-Gtter, Forts.


Ausgabe Nr. 9 Monat Dezember 1973
DER ANTIMODERNISTENEID


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Carta a Su Eminencia el obispo XXX


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Letter to His Excellency xxxx


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat September 2007
Et vous serez comme Dieu


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2007
Brief an einen Bischof...


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2007
... und eine bittere Bilanz


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2007
Das freimaurerische Prinzip


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2007
Rckkehr zur berlieferten Liturgie?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2007
Leserbrief zu: Drei heilige Bcher


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Oktober 2007
Die Falle der Motu-Proprio-Messe


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Dezember 2007
ber die Menschwerdung Christi


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Dezember 2007
Der groe Glaubensabfall am Ende der Zeiten...


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Dezember 2007
Wo zwei oder drei in Meinem Namen versammelt sind


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Dezember 2007
Das Motu Proprio nchtern betrachtet


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Dezember 2007
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat February 1984
NOUVELLE POLITIQUE D'AUTONOMIE OU HYPOCRISIE?


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
THE SO-CALLED 'EXCOMMUNICATION' OF H.E. ARCHBISHOP NG-DINH-THUC


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
Letter of Bishop Louis Vezelis, O.F.M. D.D.


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat July 1983
REPONSE DE M. L'ABB MILCH A LA LETTRE OUVERTE DU M. HELLER


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Oktober 1983
FIRST SIGN OF INDEPENDENT THINKING OR HYPOCRISY?


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat April 1983
AGAINST THE 'PROPHECY' OF THE SO-CALLED 'ROMAN CATHOLIC'


Ausgabe Nr. 14 Monat Oktober 1981
REMARQUES CONNEXES


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat June 1980
Vox FIDEl: LA VOIX DE LA FOl OU L'ORGANE DES SOUHAITS


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat August 1982
ANSWER OF REVEREND FATHER HANS MILCH


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mrz 2008
Ich glaube an die heilige katholische Kirche, die Gemeinschaft der Heiligen.


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mrz 2008
Die DITIB


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
I believe in the holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints


Ausgabe Nr. 12 Monat Mrz 2008
Apostasa y Confusin


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
ENSEIGNEMENT DE PIE XII POUR DFENDRE LES CRITURES


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat April 2008
The second Book of accusation for heresy against the author of the new Catechism from 1992


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2008
Ich leide keinen Mangel


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2008
Der schmerzliche 'Ehebruch' der 'Braut Christi'


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2008
Gegendarstellung


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2008
Nachrichten, Nachrichten, Nachrichten...


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2008
Die prinzipielle Offenbarung Gottes und die konkrete Offenbarung


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2008
Anmerkungen zur subsistit-in-Lehre


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2009
Anmerkungen zur Fastenzeit 2009


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2009
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2009
Die Holocaust-Latte liegt zu hoch!


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Mai 2009
The Holocaust Bar is too High


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2009
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2009
Weihnachtsbrief 2009


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat Diciembre 2009
Christmas Letter 2009


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2010
Ist die Religionsfreiheit ein Naturrecht?


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2010
In der 'Mitte' angekommen - Beliebigkeit als Prinzip


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2010
Verhandlungen mit Rom (Fortsetzung)


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2010
Verhandlungen mit Rom (Fortsetzung 2)


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat giugno 2010
Al crocevia


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2010
Im Eiltempo vom Abseits ins Aus


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2010
Kampf der 'political correctness'


Ausgabe Nr. 11 Monat Februar 2011
A. 6. c. Die nach dem Kirchenrecht den Neuerern zukommende Stellung.


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
E sarete come Dio (Gn. 3, 5)


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
A proposito della situazione attuale della Chiesa


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
Al crocevia


Ausgabe Nr. 13 Monat June 2011
SOBRE LA REALIDAD Y LA EXITENCIA DEL PURGATORIO


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2011
Vom Sinn der Schpfung


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2011
Die Grundhresie Johannes Pauls II.


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2011
Benedikt XVI. - in den Klauen der verborgenen Hnde


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Sptember 2011
Gott ist die Liebe


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Sptember 2011
Antwort auf einen Angriff gegen den Sedisvakantismus


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2011
Der Wiederaufbau der Kirche als Institution


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2011
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2012
Verwechslung mit Folgen


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2012
Offene Fragen an Abb Schmidberger


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2012
Weder Vertrauen noch Eifer noch Methode


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2012
Anmerkungen zur kirchlichen Situation


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 2012
Erneut auf dem Prfstand


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 2012
Das Ankupplungsmanver


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2012
Gott wird Mensch - Weihnachten 2012


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2012
Hart, aber fair - ein Briefwechsel zur aktuellen kirchlichen Situation


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Mrz 2013
Null und nichtig der Ritus der Bischofsweihe von 1968


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2013
Habemus Papam? Zur Wahl von Jorge Mario Bergoglio


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Juni 2013
Mitteilungen der Redaktion, Hinweise


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Dezember 2013
Ist Jesus Christus der Sohn Gottes?


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2014
Wie Christus als Gottes Sohn erkannt werden kann - weiterfhrende Betrachtungen


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2014
Gott will, da alle Menschen gerettet werden


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2014
Mitteilungen der Redaktion, Hinweise


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat August 2014
Die Frage bleibt: Ist Jesus Christus der Sohn Gottes?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2015
Noch einmal: Gehrt der Islam zu Deutschland?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat September 2015
Die Irrtmer des II. Vatikanums und ihre berwindung durch die Erkenntnis Christi als Sohn Gottes


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat September 2015
Fortsetzung I: Wie Christus als Gottes Sohn erkannt werden kann - weiterfhrende Betrachtungen


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat November 2015
Du sollst nicht falsches Zeugnis geben wider deinen Nchsten - Internet - Segen oder Fluch?


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2016
Mitteilungen der Redaktion


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2017
Buchbesprechung:


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2017
Der Verrat am Christentum Islam und Vatikanum II


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat April 2018
Christus ward fr uns zur Snde.


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2019
Himmelfahrt Christus im Herzen


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mai 2019
Ich rufe dich bei Deinem Namen: Mein bist Du


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat September 2019
Mitstreiter gesucht Brief an einen Konservativen


Ausgabe Nr. 1 Monat Februar 2020
Papa contra Papam


Ausgabe Nr. 2 Monat Mrz 2020
Quo vadis?


Ausgabe Nr. 3 Monat Mai 2020
Gedanken zu Einsicht, Sept. 2015, Dr. E. Heller


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2020
The Errors of Vatican II and their defeat through Recognizing Christ as Son of God


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2020
Is Jesus Christ the Son of God?


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2020
How Christ can be recognized as Son of God further reflections


Ausgabe Nr. 4 Monat Juni 2020
The Question remains: Is Jesus Christ the Son of God?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Los errores del Vaticano II y su superacin gracias al conocimiento de Cristo como Hijo de Dios


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Es Jesucristo el Hijo de Dios?


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Cmo se puede conocer a Cristo como Hijo de Dios: nuevas consideraciones


Ausgabe Nr. 5 Monat Juni 2020
Queda por responder la pregunta es Jesucristo el Hijo de Dios?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Jsus-Christ est-il le Fils de Dieu?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Comment le Christ peut tre reconnu comme le Fils de Dieu


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
La question demeure: Jsus-Christ est-il le Fils de Dieu?


Ausgabe Nr. 6 Monat Juni 2020
Les erreurs de Vatican II


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Juli 2020
Veni Creator Spiritus


Ausgabe Nr. 7 Monat Juli 2020
Buchbesprechung:


AGAINST THE 'PROPHECY' OF THE SO-CALLED 'ROMAN CATHOLIC'
 
AGAINST THE 'PROPHECY'
OF THE SO-CALLED "ROMAN CATHOLIC"


by
Nico Maria Hettinga


In the January/1983 Number of THE ROMAN CATHOLIC, a monthly published by the Roman Catholic Association, Oyster Bay/New York, an article appeared, written by Peregrinus 1), under the heading "Traditional Bishops" and the sub-heading "Two Bishops in every Garage". It was written in connection with the consecration 2), in 1981, of a few Bishops by His Eminence Mgr P.M. Ng-Dinh-Thuc. Those responsible for the publication - among whom the Reverend Fathers Anthony Cekada, Daniel L. Dolan 3) and Patrick E. Kelly - say - in their foreword - that they have postponed giving any comment until adequate information was available for them to do so in a thorough manner. After having read the article with the greatest attention possible we should appreciate you to be informed of our reactions.

As the sub-heading already suggests, the view of the matter taken by Ecne's Establishment in the United States appears to be merciless and unrefined. The material which had been collected in great quantities seemed - at first reading at least - rather impressive. The heavy guns, however, that were placed in position, fortunately proved - on closer inspection - unable to unleash the destructive power which - to all appearances - they at first suggested. Still a risky thing to do for marksmen that should have realized only too vividly that they were living in glass houses themselves, which - by the way - they must have considered - in their arrogance - to be bulletproff instead. For has not Mgr Lefbvre himself - at some earlier stage 4) - condemned Mgr Thuc's proceedings as a direct outcome of his apostasy and the rupture between him and Rome, which - on more than one occasion - he (Lefbvre) declared to be both schismatic and heretic 5).

At the time Mgr Lefbvre was - understandably - not very much upset by the quasisuspension, which - in view of this rebellious attitude - had been inflicted upon him by "Pope" Paul VI. In fact, being thrown out of a church to which one does not want to belong could hardly be called a punishment.

On the other hand, the priests of Ecne must now be prepared for their silent absorption back into the "Church of Rome" again. And it is for this reason that Mgr Lefbvre requires them 6) to recognize John Paul II as Pope, as well as to leave open - for the Novus Ordo Missae - the possibility to be considered as a regular Holy Mass. And this contrary to their convictions and even on pain of "being thrown out of the Fraternity", should they not comply. Only one or two saved their faces - and their honour - leaving of their own free will, thereby proving themselves to be men of character. Others, however, after having been obstinate for a while, saw themselves obliged to sign Mgr. Lefebvre's "Diktat" and were allowed to stay in the Fraternity on his terms: they were - of course - entitled to their own ideas with respect to the two sore subjects (J.P.II + N.O.M.), as long as they kept to themselves and toed the pary-line.7)

The chances are that their consciences will prevent them from "living out their 8) days in peace", unless they were to opt out and quit the Fraternity. The three priests mentioned above, who - at a given moment - seeing themselves faced with the choice from the two alternatives, preferred to stay within the Fraternity, would have been expected to at least have some discreet consideration for the problem, the solution of which it must undoubtedly have cost e.g. the then Reverend Father Louis Vezelis some agony of mind to find. It is certainly no trifle matter to have to make a public statement according to which one sees oneself forced to finally abandon one's position held until the very last moment, but it was Father Vezelis had the courage to do so. For this he deserves every homage and respect. - In his case there was only the question of recognizing John Paul II, yes or no.

Concerning the so-called "enormity" committed by Mgr Thuc in performing the consecrations in Spain (Palmar de Troya): much to our regret the information was omitted according to which it was two priests the Aged Prelate had met 9) during his stay in Ecne, by whom he was persuaded to accept an invitation to accompany them on a threedays' journey to Spain, where the consecrations were (scheduled?) to be performed! Had the story then secretly started from there? What you may not know is that at a given moment Mgr Thuc was offered 10) the direction of the seminary in Ecne and the reason why he decide to reject it can only be a matter of conjecture. What we are told now by Mgr Lefbvre is that "apparently Mgr Thuc has completely gone out of his mind"! Could there have been a connection between the rejection of the offer to lead the seminary and the offer of the ride to Spain? That occasionally Ecne finds it self obliged to under the circumstances - be a little careless of persons whose services until recently it meant to be entitled to enlist (!) may be clear from the affair concerning the Reverend Father Fernandes Krohn, after whose quasiattempt upon John Paul II's life Ecne sent round word "not to have had any contacts with said priest for the last few years", whereas as late as in April 1982 the latter had wirtten an article 11) in a circular for a parish that was in constant touch with it! As a further illustration of this dubious mentality could be mentioned Ecne's treatment of the Reverend Dr. Otto Katzer 12), who died on the 18th of June 1979. Less than two months before he had received a letter from the Archbishop Mgr. M. Lefbvre to the effect that he had better leave off teaching at Weiszbad Seminary to which place they had lured him all the way from Czechoslovakia a little more than a year before! Although anybody concerned knew or could have known his views long before he was invited over, he was told to go because of "differences of opinion", among other things concerning the validity of the Novus Ordo Missae and the Vacancy of the See of Rome!

Now, if there should be any question at all of responsibility for what happened in Spain, it would have to be on joint account, it being left to anybody in his senses to name the partners. Surely e couldn't saddle Pius XII with the responsibility for what cardinals and bishops entered upon their duties during his pontificate have done, done wrong or left undone during as well as after the 2nd Vatican Council!

How could Ecne - for that matter, - dare reproach Palmar de Troya anyway? For both recognize - and don't they? - "popes" that - if it comes to the point - wouldn't stand a ghost of a chance 13), although we know Palmar to - at least - dismiss the N.O.M. fair is fair! Also about Mgr Thuc's character and his person we are told one or two things as well as about all that is supposed to have happened in the past. But even if his way of acting should have been borne in upon him through rancour, we should remember that this could easily be accounted for, since the conciliar church, in the person of Paul VI 14), had incurred suspicion of backing up Vietnam's "liberation" by the communists. Nor shall we easily forget that "even" Cardinal Alfrink sent the "authorities" in Hanoi his congratulations on that occasion! Significant, too, was Paul VI's omission to condole with Mgr. Thuc on the murder of the latter's brother.

However, without even daring - at this moment - to presume to give an opinion of Mgr Thuc's possible motives we should - in all honesty - like to ask Mgr Lefbvre if he has ever worried about the validity or legality of what ordinations or consecrations were performed by - e.g. - Achilles Cardinal Linart 15) who is known to have held a very high masonic degree, but to whom - nevertheless - the Monseigneur is indebted for his own dignity.

Might not even a "self-styled" Bishop after all appear to be just that little more eligible? As far as the good intentions of Mgr. Lefbvre are concerned we won't harbour any doubts, but we are not so sure of his freedom of action: Hasn't he let out once - during an interview 16) with the historian Rius Facius, that he would lose his seminaries, should he not acknowledge John Paul II to be orthodox and the new religion to be catholic. But isn't he after all primarily concerned about the truth then, and only about the truth?

Mgr. Thuc and "his" Bishops are reproaches for their want of discipline, and the rites and rubrics to be employed according to the Roman Pontifical are said to have been applied in not all too careful a manner. Against the first reproach might be said that surely Mgr. Lefbvre should be able to understand the motives of theses bishops to operate in somebody else's jurisdiction, since he himself has - for years running and "with the best of intentions 17) imaginable", but without being authorized in any way whatsoever - traversed - with impunity - no matter whose jurisdiction! In spite of all that he pretends that for the priests ordained by him there is still a way back 18) into the (post)conciliar church: who is going to ordain the candidates, should Monseigneur no longer be available, is apparently not so important, that he would even be prepared to fall out with Rome 19) over the consecration of a successor. As to the purportedly incorrect use of the Roman Pontifical: undoubtedly meant is the post-conciliar ritual of which - by now - we all know that it either causes questions to be asked or doubts to be raised 20), not to say that it deserves to be openly rejected, for the simple reason that - just as the rites to be used when ordaining priests - it cannot possibly produce the originally intended effect in view of the sweeping and drastic changes. Should however the pr-conciliar pontifical have been slightly misused, we can only hope - and with good reson - that the exceptional circumstances prevailing may have excuses Mgr Thuc: should he at times not altogether have complied with the rules, it is obvious that his intentions were beyond reproach, which - of course - can no longer be said of the (post)conciliar church. This - by the way - also pertains to another reproach, according to which Mgr Thuc is said to have "simulated" while participating in a "Novus Ordo Missae" in not receiving "Holy Communion"! Which - mysteriously so - purports to be a grave sin. Since he is aware of the fact that the N.O.M. pretends to be a regular Holy Mass in the only and true sense of the word, it is all the more understandable that he did not receive "Holy Communion" 21). Only a hypocrite could reproach him for it: qui potest capere capiat: he that can understand, that he may do so.

It is completely inconceivable how - with a view to the so-called illicit consecration of bishops anybody dare refer to the Codex Iuris Canonici, for in the first place it should be known, by now, to everybody that only recently 22) we could have seen a new codex "launched", fully adapted to the lates situation in the postconciliar church. And, in the second place, the decree of the Holy Office of the 9th of April 1951 had a bearing on indeed the unlawfulness of the consecration of bishops in the Chinese National Church under the Communist Regime, but had Pius XII been able to foresee that ever a situation should arise as the one we are in now, he would without doubt have added a clause, in virtue of which e.g. a Mgr Thuc could never be condemned for what he had only done to save the Church.

The statement according to which Mgr. Thuc's Bishops should consider him more or less a "Pope" can hardly be taken seriously. In this context please refer to earlier insinuations 23) made by critics to the effect that the "traditional bishops" might well be expected - before long - to choose their own "Pope". Nothing is more beside the truth and this is a fact. The only reason 24) why Mgr. Thuc has meant them to commit themselves to him and which he pressed upon their hearts was - should ever the general situation in the Church take a turn for the better - to make the way "back" easier by means of mutual contacts through one accepted by all, which would be all the more difficult to achieve if he should have allowed them to drift appart. And if he ever were to have consecrated an "Old-Catholic", then surely at any rate on the understanding, that first a conversion to the authentic Roman Catholic Church should be effected. And for an intelligent person it will be abundantly clear that under the present circumstances such conversions cannot possibly any longer be registered by "Rome", nor should they in the first place.

H.E. Mgr. M.L. Gurard des Lauriers, O.P., the first Bishop consecrated by Mgr. Thuc, as well as the other Bishops are blamed for not having seriously delved into the theological problems regarding the "Sede Vacante" -issue, whereas everybody should know, that - already at a very early stage - he made it quite plain to Paul VI that the latter's preoccupation with the "N.O.M." was irreconcilable with orthodox teaching. Mgr. Gurard des Lauriers is also known to be the author of the petition presented Paul VI by the Cardinals Ottaviani and Bacci 25) on the 3rd of September 1969 (Feast of Saint Pius X). That he - after that - decidedly not has spent his days in idleness will be clear from the many publications to his name; suffice it to mention the "Cahiers de Cassiciacum" 26), whose editor he is and in Number I of which he already raised the "Sede Vacante" -issue. Also written by him was a clever analysis in which Mgr Lefbvre's point of view is clearly demonstrated to be untenable.

Significant in this connection is Reverend Father Bisig's 27) statement at the end of the General Chapter of the Fraternity (from 13-16 September 1982) (!) to the effect that it was getting high time for Ecne to shore up her stand by means of theological expositions.

We must be short about punctuation marks - comma's and stops - as well as mistakes in grammar and/or syntax. To saddle somebody with talking about the Holy Father - whom he doesn't accept as Pope - and thn, leaving out the indispensable inverted comma's or omitting to report the writer's use of them, at the same time accuzing him of inconsistency, that simply isn't done! And where Mgr Thuc speaks about Good Pope John (XXIII), we must not forget that at the time this was a common expression. In places things - come up - that can only be called instances of incompleteness, inaccuracy or even narrow-mindedness. The six priests e.g. have never disassociated 28) themselves from Mgr Gurard des Lauriers: "ils se tiennent (seulement) a  apporter quelques prcisions", tant lis different titres au Rvrend Pre; this means, that - since for various reasons they knew themselves to be pledged to the Reverend Father - they felt obliged to define their position.

One of the (so-called!) newly consecrated Mexican Bishops is said to be ignorant "and seemed more to be a poor little ranch pastor 29) than a bishop". No doubt H.E. Mgr Jos de Jesus Roberto Martinez Y Gutierrez is meant here, who - just about two years before he was consecrated a Bishop - was apparently important enough to be kidnapped by a band of Guerrilleros armed with pistols and machine-guns. Taken to a lonely place he was stripped, beaten with sticks, kicked and threatened with murder. When - by amazing good fortune - he manged - still alive - to reach his parish, he was received with cheers of enthusiasm. According to the press all this had happened by order of "bishop" Rafal Bello Ruiz of Acapulco, who was ostensibly irritated by the little pastor's adamant bearing: Mgr Thuc seems to have had good reasons for not wanting to give too much publicity to his consecrations.

H.E. Mgr. George Musey when still a parish-priest is said to have changed places six times in only eleven years; omitted, however, is that - in the end - he survived a heartattack 30): apparently his priestly life doesn't seem to have been all that easy for him! Also omitted is, that - after a few years of inactivity for reasons of health - he resumed his priestly task in co-operation with the Fraternity(!), so with Ecne 31), only to disassociate himself from them in 1976. Needless to say that he must have had his reasons for doing so.

The article which is liberally provided with references has - where the latter are concerned - failed us only in two places: Reference number 12 was concerning Mgr Thuc's purported simulation during his "participation" in a "N.O.M.", mentioned above; number 57, however, refers to the pages 13 and 14 in his Autobiography where he is supposed to deal with standing, sitting or squatting - yes or no - which he thought were the right postures for the Japanese and the Hindus to receive Holy Communion. It is in vain that we have been looking for this on the pages concerned. A sensible man, however, could have distilled from these - as said, unfindable - words of Mgr Thuc's the argument that it might have been his intention to advance in order to reproach Paul VI for condemning those Roman Catholics who still clung to the time-honoured Roman Catholic Holy Mass.

The Bishops are blamed for having established a new religion 32) together with a new magisterium, whereas Mgr Lefbvre himself had already put on record, that the church had developped a different religion. It goes without saying that the Old Doctrine will sound strange to the dyed-in-the-woll post-conciliar hierarchy and their henchmen. And whereas Mgr Louis Vezelis until fairly recently - although recognizing John Paul II - did not agree with everything the latter said and did, Ecne went even a step further in creating their "Rahmen-Papst" 33). Ecne is also mighty pleased when the Congregation for the Religious divulges, that the then Father L. Vezelis is not recognizes by Rome; but - on the other hand - if refuses to "celebrate the N.O.M.", althought-again Ecne keeps open the possibility for it to be an authentic Holy Mass. So, after all and when everything is said and done, Ecne itself creates its own Magisterium!

To make a long story short; for those who begin to understand the background of it all a little better the article could have been triggered off by disappointment; now that Mgr Lefebvre's "monopoly" apparently has been broken! We clearly sense Ecne's exasperation, emanating from it, at the impudence of those who have dared to vie with he monseigneur! Nor should we be surprised by this, for Ecne has - already for some time - created the strong impression to be no - thing mor nor less than a fellowtraveller of the post-conciliar church, back to which it will - in due time - and very meekly so - help lead the flocks, entrusted to its priests in the various Masscentres, as if to the true sheep-fold! 34) In its struggle for power it will never suffer even the very least competition; neither in Europe, nor, for that matter, anywhere else in the world, which was clearly demonstrated at the occasion of Mgr. Lefbvre's visit to Mexico 35), some time ago. The methods, however, which it applies in acquiring and/or holding that monopoly do - indeed - make the authenticity of its ambitions, to say the least, very questionable...

NOTES AND REFERENCES!

1. Peregrinus (Latin) means: stranger; here (significantly!): OUTSIDER.
2. For detailed information re these consecrations, please refer to "EINSICHT", Germany. Special, March 1982, as well as following numbers. Address: Freundeskreis der UNA VOCE, Riedhofweg 4, D-82544-Egling,  Germany.
3. In the April-number of EINSICHT 1981, page 293, the Ref. Father L. Dolan is co-signer - together with Prof.B.F. Dryden - of an article in which - with a view to Canon 188 par. 4 (C.I.C.) - the authors state that we do not owe obedience to heretics, as for instance Paul VI and Johannes Paulus II. In the same article we read that the 1978 conclave cannot possibly have produced a legitimate pope.
4. Viz. in the June number of "THE ANGELUS" 1982, page 7.
5. If we remember well Mgr. M. Lefbvre said so on the occasion or of in view his socalled suspension, which was inflicted upon him by Paul VI.
6. Mgr. Lefbvre made these demands in his notorious declaration on 8. Nov. 1979. In the "KATHOLISCHES SONNTAGSBLATT" (Diocese of Rottenburg / 9. Nov. 1980) Mgr. Ratzinger says that Mgr. Lefbvre recognizes Paul VI's N.O.M.
7. Please refer to "ECNE, POINT FINAL", page 68; this is a special of "FORTS DANS LA FOI" 2nd Term 1981, number 10: "Les trois Prtres mis au pas".
8. See also THE ROMAN CATHOLIC of January 1983, page 8, just over the headline "A Home with EINSICHT".
9. Mgr. P.M. Ng-Dinh-Thuc describes this meeting on page 85 in his AUTOBIOGRAPHY: It's an August 1982, Special of EINSICHT.
10. Read, with regard to this offer, December-number 1982 EINSICHT, page 139 down below.
11. For this article we refer you to SUPPLEMENT MYSTERIUM FIDEl (28. June 1982): Editor: Alfred Denoyelle, 21 Rue de Sonnet, 1080-Bruxelles. Belgium.
12. Read the Oct. (page 143) and Dec. (page 175) numbers of EINSICHT 1979.
13. Read, concerning Johannes Paulus II, an instruction by the Rev. Louis Marie de Blignires: "JEAN-PAUL II et LA DOCTRINE CATHOLIQUE"; published by DIDASCO, B.P. 2 - Bruxelles 24, Belgium.
In the May-number of EINSICHT 1982, page 26, we read that - according to Mgr Lefbvre - the NON in the vernacular is not valid: Historian Rius Facius, however, rightly observes that John Paul II says the N.O.M. in whichsoever language he deems fit.
14. In its October number 1982, page 109, EINSICHT has it, that the then ambassador of the U.S.A., with the Vatican, Cabot Lodge, receives an affirmative answer form Paul VI to his question whether the Vatican favours Vietnam's democratization. And in its May-number 1982, page 3, Mgr. Thuc says, that Paul VI never said even so much as one word to express his sympathy, when the former's brothers Diem and Nhu had been murdered by the Communist Regime. The Dutch will undoubtedly remember Bernard Cardinal Alfrink's words (KRO/TV on 3 May 1975 at 10.35 P.M.): "Freedom and Peace have returned to Vietnam!"
15. Please refer to March-number 1976 of "CHIESA VIVA"; Editor: Luigi Villa; CIVILTA, Via G. Galilei, 121 - 251oo BRESCIA/Italy.
16. Statement made during an interview with Rius Facius (see also above: note 13). On the 8th of November 1975 Mgr. Etchegaray says in an address to a party of Protestant guests: "Since the 2nd Vatican Council you have no longer possessed the monopoly of the Reformation!" Indeed a new religion has come into being then!
17. According to "ECNE, PORTES OUVERTES", a publication of the Pius X Fraternity, page 44 Mgr. Lefbvre said in the Salle Wagram on the 4th of October 1975: "Canon Law must never be enforced to the detriment of our spiritual welfare: nor would we act correctly if we were to excuse the practice of abortion by referring to a law admitting it."
18. Read Mgr. Lefbvre's notorious circular letter nr. 16 of 13 March 1979, in which it is suggested that he wants the priests, ordained by him, to work under the authority of the local bishops. The Reverend M.L. Gurard des Lauriers said in an open letter on Maunday Thursday: (12/4'79) "Monseigneur, nous ne voulons pas de cette paix." And to Abb de Nantes's letter Mgr. Lefbvre answered on 19 March 1975: "Sachez que si un vque rompt avec Rome ce ne sera pas moi"; Ecne, portes Ouvertes; pag. 36.
19. The "STUTTGARTER ZEITUNG" of 21 July 1982 confirms this.
20. Read "DE WAANORDE" by the Rev. V.A. Stuyver, PP; especially that which is said about "Matter and Form" of the Rite. His conclusion on page 13 is: "So, ... worthless and invalid!" (Editor: Mr. E. Suys, Kerkhofstraat 3, 2670 Puurs /Belgium.)
21. Refer to "LETTRES NON-CONFORMISTES", number 28/April 1980; pages 4-6; Editor: Ren Rouchette, B.P. 151 - F - 16105 - Cognac Cedes.
22. Namely on the 23 January 1983.
23. See the June-number of THE ANGELUS 1982, page 7. 24. See EINSICHT, October 1982, page 103.
25. "Roman Theologians take a look at the N.O.M." (AUGUSTINE PUBLISHING Company /Chawleigh-Chulmleight; Devon; Great-Britain. Originally published by (25/9'69) Vaduz, (Liechtenstein).
26. Refer to a.o.: "CAHIERS DE CASSICIACUM"; a publication of Ass. St. Hermenegilde, 18 Ave Bellevue, 01600 Nice, France.
27. EINSICHT, February 1983, page 176.
28. FORTS DANS LA FOI", number 9/1982; page 53. See also Pre Barbara's latest circular letter "Was Sie wissen mssen"; page 13 down below.
29. EINSICHT - October/'82; Page 97/98.
30. EINSICHT - December/'82; Page 136.
31. EINSICHT - May/'82; Page 28.
32. Also see note 16 (above): Should Mgr. Lefbvre not recognize The New religion, he fears he might lose his seminaries ...
33. Read what the Reverend Father Franz Schmidberger says about this in "MITTEILUNGSBLATT fr den Deutschen Sprachraum"; page 2, February 1982.
34. "... in der Scho der Kirche ..." (within the fold of the Church); EINSICHT, Febr. 1983; page 176.
35. EINSICHT May/'82; page 25 ff.
 
(c) 2004-2018 brainsquad.de